Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22) into a single composite show cause notice under ss. 73/74 of the CGST/KGST Act for reversal of input tax credit was held invalid, as such bunching had already been declared illegal in an earlier binding decision. Since the proceedings were founded on an impermissible consolidated notice, the consequential adjudication order could not survive. The composite show cause notice and the ensuing order were quashed, and the respondent was directed to drop the proceedings; the petition was allowed. - HC
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22) into a single composite show cause notice under ss. 73/74 of the CGST/KGST Act for reversal of input tax credit was held invalid, as such bunching had already been declared illegal in an earlier binding decision. Since the proceedings were founded on an impermissible consolidated notice, the consequential adjudication order could not survive. The composite show cause notice and the ensuing order were quashed, and the respondent was directed to drop the proceedings; the petition was allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
