Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Claim for reimbursement of differential GST arising from rate increase from 12% to 18% was rejected on the ground that the contractual circular-based liability to bear differential tax depends on the tax rate as on invoice/payment date, and the delay in raising the invoice after issuance of the work completion certificate was attributable to the claimant rather than the principal. Consequently, denial of differential GST was upheld. The Court further held that the dispute involved contested factual issues unsuitable for adjudication under Article 226, and dismissed the writ petition while granting liberty to pursue remedies before the civil court or arbitral forum. - HC
Claim for reimbursement of differential GST arising from rate increase from 12% to 18% was rejected on the ground that the contractual circular-based liability to bear differential tax depends on the tax rate as on invoice/payment date, and the delay in raising the invoice after issuance of the work completion certificate was attributable to the claimant rather than the principal. Consequently, denial of differential GST was upheld. The Court further held that the dispute involved contested factual issues unsuitable for adjudication under Article 226, and dismissed the writ petition while granting liberty to pursue remedies before the civil court or arbitral forum. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
