Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Claim for reimbursement of differential GST arising from rate increase from 12% to 18% was rejected on the ground that the contractual circular-based liability to bear differential tax depends on the tax rate as on invoice/payment date, and the delay in raising the invoice after issuance of the work completion certificate was attributable to the claimant rather than the principal. Consequently, denial of differential GST was upheld. The Court further held that the dispute involved contested factual issues unsuitable for adjudication under Article 226, and dismissed the writ petition while granting liberty to pursue remedies before the civil court or arbitral forum. - HC
Claim for reimbursement of differential GST arising from rate increase from 12% to 18% was rejected on the ground that the contractual circular-based liability to bear differential tax depends on the tax rate as on invoice/payment date, and the delay in raising the invoice after issuance of the work completion certificate was attributable to the claimant rather than the principal. Consequently, denial of differential GST was upheld. The Court further held that the dispute involved contested factual issues unsuitable for adjudication under Article 226, and dismissed the writ petition while granting liberty to pursue remedies before the civil court or arbitral forum. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
