Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Temporary export of goods for own use in executing an overseas service contract, without consideration or transfer of title, was held not to constitute a "supply" under GST, relying on CBIC clarification; consequently, IGST was not payable at export and recovery under Sl. No.1(d) of Notification No.45/2017-Customs was inapplicable, making the transaction fall within the exemption for exports otherwise than by way of supply. The denial of BCD/SWS exemption merely due to alleged IGST non-compliance was rejected since the notification grants component-wise exemptions with independent conditions. Extended limitation was disallowed absent fraud/suppression as disclosures were made in statutory documents, and confiscation/fine/penalties were set aside; the demand was quashed and appeal allowed with consequential relief. - CESTAT
Temporary export of goods for own use in executing an overseas service contract, without consideration or transfer of title, was held not to constitute a "supply" under GST, relying on CBIC clarification; consequently, IGST was not payable at export and recovery under Sl. No.1(d) of Notification No.45/2017-Customs was inapplicable, making the transaction fall within the exemption for exports otherwise than by way of supply. The denial of BCD/SWS exemption merely due to alleged IGST non-compliance was rejected since the notification grants component-wise exemptions with independent conditions. Extended limitation was disallowed absent fraud/suppression as disclosures were made in statutory documents, and confiscation/fine/penalties were set aside; the demand was quashed and appeal allowed with consequential relief. - CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.