Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Whether a higher withholding rate under s.197 could be imposed on payments to a non-resident supplier on the premise of a PE in India was examined. Since the earlier s.197 certificates were consistently issued at 1.5%, and the revenue's sole basis for increasing the rate to 3.5% (a finding of PE for AY 2022-23) stood set aside by the ITAT, the higher-rate direction lost its legal foundation. The impugned 3.5% certificate was quashed and a fresh certificate at 1.5% was directed within 15 days; future s.197 certificates were also directed to be issued at 1.5% unless the ITAT order is reversed/modified or fresh evidence of PE emerges, in which case notice and opportunity must precede any higher-rate certificate. - HC
Whether a higher withholding rate under s.197 could be imposed on payments to a non-resident supplier on the premise of a PE in India was examined. Since the earlier s.197 certificates were consistently issued at 1.5%, and the revenue's sole basis for increasing the rate to 3.5% (a finding of PE for AY 2022-23) stood set aside by the ITAT, the higher-rate direction lost its legal foundation. The impugned 3.5% certificate was quashed and a fresh certificate at 1.5% was directed within 15 days; future s.197 certificates were also directed to be issued at 1.5% unless the ITAT order is reversed/modified or fresh evidence of PE emerges, in which case notice and opportunity must precede any higher-rate certificate. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
