Condonation of Delay denied: communication lapses and corporate restructuring found insufficient; prolonged inaction and lack of bona fides led to ref...
Export Support intervention INSIGHT launched to provide non financial capacity building, trade intelligence and pilot support with defined funding and...
Whether a higher withholding rate under s.197 could be imposed on payments to a non-resident supplier on the premise of a PE in India was examined. Since the earlier s.197 certificates were consistently issued at 1.5%, and the revenue's sole basis for increasing the rate to 3.5% (a finding of PE for AY 2022-23) stood set aside by the ITAT, the higher-rate direction lost its legal foundation. The impugned 3.5% certificate was quashed and a fresh certificate at 1.5% was directed within 15 days; future s.197 certificates were also directed to be issued at 1.5% unless the ITAT order is reversed/modified or fresh evidence of PE emerges, in which case notice and opportunity must precede any higher-rate certificate. - HC
Whether a higher withholding rate under s.197 could be imposed on payments to a non-resident supplier on the premise of a PE in India was examined. Since the earlier s.197 certificates were consistently issued at 1.5%, and the revenue's sole basis for increasing the rate to 3.5% (a finding of PE for AY 2022-23) stood set aside by the ITAT, the higher-rate direction lost its legal foundation. The impugned 3.5% certificate was quashed and a fresh certificate at 1.5% was directed within 15 days; future s.197 certificates were also directed to be issued at 1.5% unless the ITAT order is reversed/modified or fresh evidence of PE emerges, in which case notice and opportunity must precede any higher-rate certificate. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.