Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer of a flat under a development arrangement was held not to generate STCG because the assessee never received possession or "held" the first-floor flat; the buyer was put in vacant possession during construction and conveyance was executed directly, so the assessee's transfer was of undivided land share with attributable improvement cost, warranting LTCG treatment; AO directed to compute LTCG and CIT(A) set aside. Expenditure incurred to deliver a finished area to the original lessor under a pre-existing lease obligation was allowable in computing capital gains under s. 48; addition deleted. Exemption under s. 54(2) was allowed since amounts kept in term deposits were actually utilized for construction within the stipulated period despite not being parked in CGDS; AO directed to grant exemption. - ITAT
Transfer of a flat under a development arrangement was held not to generate STCG because the assessee never received possession or "held" the first-floor flat; the buyer was put in vacant possession during construction and conveyance was executed directly, so the assessee's transfer was of undivided land share with attributable improvement cost, warranting LTCG treatment; AO directed to compute LTCG and CIT(A) set aside. Expenditure incurred to deliver a finished area to the original lessor under a pre-existing lease obligation was allowable in computing capital gains under s. 48; addition deleted. Exemption under s. 54(2) was allowed since amounts kept in term deposits were actually utilized for construction within the stipulated period despite not being parked in CGDS; AO directed to grant exemption. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.