Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Transfer of a flat under a development arrangement was held not to generate STCG because the assessee never received possession or "held" the first-floor flat; the buyer was put in vacant possession during construction and conveyance was executed directly, so the assessee's transfer was of undivided land share with attributable improvement cost, warranting LTCG treatment; AO directed to compute LTCG and CIT(A) set aside. Expenditure incurred to deliver a finished area to the original lessor under a pre-existing lease obligation was allowable in computing capital gains under s. 48; addition deleted. Exemption under s. 54(2) was allowed since amounts kept in term deposits were actually utilized for construction within the stipulated period despite not being parked in CGDS; AO directed to grant exemption. - ITAT
Transfer of a flat under a development arrangement was held not to generate STCG because the assessee never received possession or "held" the first-floor flat; the buyer was put in vacant possession during construction and conveyance was executed directly, so the assessee's transfer was of undivided land share with attributable improvement cost, warranting LTCG treatment; AO directed to compute LTCG and CIT(A) set aside. Expenditure incurred to deliver a finished area to the original lessor under a pre-existing lease obligation was allowable in computing capital gains under s. 48; addition deleted. Exemption under s. 54(2) was allowed since amounts kept in term deposits were actually utilized for construction within the stipulated period despite not being parked in CGDS; AO directed to grant exemption. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.