Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Transfer of a flat under a development arrangement was held not to generate STCG because the assessee never received possession or "held" the first-floor flat; the buyer was put in vacant possession during construction and conveyance was executed directly, so the assessee's transfer was of undivided land share with attributable improvement cost, warranting LTCG treatment; AO directed to compute LTCG and CIT(A) set aside. Expenditure incurred to deliver a finished area to the original lessor under a pre-existing lease obligation was allowable in computing capital gains under s. 48; addition deleted. Exemption under s. 54(2) was allowed since amounts kept in term deposits were actually utilized for construction within the stipulated period despite not being parked in CGDS; AO directed to grant exemption. - ITAT
Transfer of a flat under a development arrangement was held not to generate STCG because the assessee never received possession or "held" the first-floor flat; the buyer was put in vacant possession during construction and conveyance was executed directly, so the assessee's transfer was of undivided land share with attributable improvement cost, warranting LTCG treatment; AO directed to compute LTCG and CIT(A) set aside. Expenditure incurred to deliver a finished area to the original lessor under a pre-existing lease obligation was allowable in computing capital gains under s. 48; addition deleted. Exemption under s. 54(2) was allowed since amounts kept in term deposits were actually utilized for construction within the stipulated period despite not being parked in CGDS; AO directed to grant exemption. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.