Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
In a Section 9 IBC claim founded on proforma invoices bearing a GST number, failure to furnish GST-payment particulars despite opportunity justified doubting the genuineness and quantum of the operational debt, supporting dismissal. The claim based on a tripartite management agreement also failed for want of privity, as the operational creditor was not a signatory and no contractual obligation of the corporate debtor towards it was shown, defeating that component of debt. Further, the corporate debtor raised a plausible contractual dispute requiring adjudication outside IBC, and Section 9 cannot be invoked for disputed debts or amounts below the statutory threshold; accordingly, admission was refused. - NCLAT
In a Section 9 IBC claim founded on proforma invoices bearing a GST number, failure to furnish GST-payment particulars despite opportunity justified doubting the genuineness and quantum of the operational debt, supporting dismissal. The claim based on a tripartite management agreement also failed for want of privity, as the operational creditor was not a signatory and no contractual obligation of the corporate debtor towards it was shown, defeating that component of debt. Further, the corporate debtor raised a plausible contractual dispute requiring adjudication outside IBC, and Section 9 cannot be invoked for disputed debts or amounts below the statutory threshold; accordingly, admission was refused. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
