Co-operative society's mandatory reserve and share capital fixed deposits with banks-interest treated as business income under 80P(2)(a)(iii) deductio...
Income tax reassessment reopening after four years on investigation tip, without s.147 proviso disclosure failure, struck down as borrowed satisfactio...
The dominant issue was whether a suspension order was justified where alleged fraudulent input tax credit was claimed and the GST registration was later cancelled. The Court noted that the taxpayer had obtained deemed registration, a physical inspection report had already been submitted, and a show cause notice had been issued; despite this, ITC was allegedly claimed thereafter. On these facts, the Court held that continued suspension was unwarranted and set aside the suspension order, while clarifying that the authorities could still proceed with and conclude disciplinary proceedings within three months. - HC
The dominant issue was whether a suspension order was justified where alleged fraudulent input tax credit was claimed and the GST registration was later cancelled. The Court noted that the taxpayer had obtained deemed registration, a physical inspection report had already been submitted, and a show cause notice had been issued; despite this, ITC was allegedly claimed thereafter. On these facts, the Court held that continued suspension was unwarranted and set aside the suspension order, while clarifying that the authorities could still proceed with and conclude disciplinary proceedings within three months. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
