Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
Classification of imported goods as electronic cigarette versus tobacco product reversed for lack of proof; order set aside for jurisdictional overrea...
Challenge to rectification of GST demand where the taxpayer had partly reversed liability in the GSTR-3B for 2018-2019 was addressed by applying the court's consistent approach that the adjudicating authority must reconsider the matter on merits after securing revenue. The matter was remitted for a fresh merits order, subject to the taxpayer depositing 100% of the admitted tax demand in cash (with applicable interest and penalty) and also depositing 100% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days, with any prior cash-ledger debit for the relevant period to be adjusted as pre-deposit on verification - HC
Challenge to rectification of GST demand where the taxpayer had partly reversed liability in the GSTR-3B for 2018-2019 was addressed by applying the court's consistent approach that the adjudicating authority must reconsider the matter on merits after securing revenue. The matter was remitted for a fresh merits order, subject to the taxpayer depositing 100% of the admitted tax demand in cash (with applicable interest and penalty) and also depositing 100% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days, with any prior cash-ledger debit for the relevant period to be adjusted as pre-deposit on verification - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
