Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Challenge to rectification of GST demand where the taxpayer had partly reversed liability in the GSTR-3B for 2018-2019 was addressed by applying the court's consistent approach that the adjudicating authority must reconsider the matter on merits after securing revenue. The matter was remitted for a fresh merits order, subject to the taxpayer depositing 100% of the admitted tax demand in cash (with applicable interest and penalty) and also depositing 100% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days, with any prior cash-ledger debit for the relevant period to be adjusted as pre-deposit on verification - HC
Challenge to rectification of GST demand where the taxpayer had partly reversed liability in the GSTR-3B for 2018-2019 was addressed by applying the court's consistent approach that the adjudicating authority must reconsider the matter on merits after securing revenue. The matter was remitted for a fresh merits order, subject to the taxpayer depositing 100% of the admitted tax demand in cash (with applicable interest and penalty) and also depositing 100% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days, with any prior cash-ledger debit for the relevant period to be adjusted as pre-deposit on verification - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
