Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Whether provisional release of imported battery-operated massagers could be denied for want of DCGI approval and an EPR registration certificate was examined. Relying on applicable FAQs, the court held that such massagers, being for wellness/soothing and not therapeutic or disease-alleviation use, do not require approval under the Medical Device Rules, 2017; consequently, the objection based on lack of DCGI approval failed. On EPR compliance, the court noted the relevant public notice permitting filing of EPR applications even post-release, and found that this material was suppressed by the department; hence, the continued detention was unwarranted. The review petitions were dismissed. - HC
Whether provisional release of imported battery-operated massagers could be denied for want of DCGI approval and an EPR registration certificate was examined. Relying on applicable FAQs, the court held that such massagers, being for wellness/soothing and not therapeutic or disease-alleviation use, do not require approval under the Medical Device Rules, 2017; consequently, the objection based on lack of DCGI approval failed. On EPR compliance, the court noted the relevant public notice permitting filing of EPR applications even post-release, and found that this material was suppressed by the department; hence, the continued detention was unwarranted. The review petitions were dismissed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
