Admissibility of inquiry statements and electronic printouts in customs adjudication requires witness examination and cross-examination before relianc...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6921 to 6940 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In determining whether the importer's advertisement and sales promotion expenditure could be added to assessable value under Rule 10(1)(e) of the 2007 Customs Valuation Rules, it was held that statements recorded under s.108 could not be relied upon because the mandatory procedure under s.138B was not followed, vitiating their evidentiary use. On merits, the marketing-support clause and first-year discount did not establish that any discount or promotional spend was a condition of sale or an amount paid/payable to the seller; the expenses were incurred on the importer's own account and were therefore not includible in assessable value. The demand of differential duty with interest and penalty was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. - CESTAT
In determining whether the importer's advertisement and sales promotion expenditure could be added to assessable value under Rule 10(1)(e) of the 2007 Customs Valuation Rules, it was held that statements recorded under s.108 could not be relied upon because the mandatory procedure under s.138B was not followed, vitiating their evidentiary use. On merits, the marketing-support clause and first-year discount did not establish that any discount or promotional spend was a condition of sale or an amount paid/payable to the seller; the expenses were incurred on the importer's own account and were therefore not includible in assessable value. The demand of differential duty with interest and penalty was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. - CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
