Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Interpretation of the term "existing management" in an approved resolution plan was central to deciding whether a pending civil suit for mesne profits could continue against the corporate debtor under new management. The court held that "existing management" referred to the management immediately prior to takeover, and the resolution plan permitted continuation only to determine monetary liability recoverable, if any, from the erstwhile management, not from the corporate debtor/new management. Since an approved plan under s. 31(1) IBC freezes and extinguishes all claims not provided for, the suit was barred against the corporate debtor/new management; it could proceed only against the erstwhile management if steps were taken within a fortnight, failing which it would be treated as disposed. - HC
Interpretation of the term "existing management" in an approved resolution plan was central to deciding whether a pending civil suit for mesne profits could continue against the corporate debtor under new management. The court held that "existing management" referred to the management immediately prior to takeover, and the resolution plan permitted continuation only to determine monetary liability recoverable, if any, from the erstwhile management, not from the corporate debtor/new management. Since an approved plan under s. 31(1) IBC freezes and extinguishes all claims not provided for, the suit was barred against the corporate debtor/new management; it could proceed only against the erstwhile management if steps were taken within a fortnight, failing which it would be treated as disposed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
