Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A Section 7 application was rejected as time-barred, raising issues whether the claimant was a financial creditor and whether the claim was within limitation. The underlying contract treated the trade advance as converting into a debt carrying time value of money upon default, satisfying the statutory elements of "financial debt"; consequently, the claimant was correctly classified as a financial creditor. On limitation, the exclusion/extension period directed in the SC suo motu proceedings required adding the balance limitation from 15.03.2020 to 01.03.2022, rendering the filing within time; therefore, the rejection on limitation was unsustainable and the appeal was allowed. - NCLAT
A Section 7 application was rejected as time-barred, raising issues whether the claimant was a financial creditor and whether the claim was within limitation. The underlying contract treated the trade advance as converting into a debt carrying time value of money upon default, satisfying the statutory elements of "financial debt"; consequently, the claimant was correctly classified as a financial creditor. On limitation, the exclusion/extension period directed in the SC suo motu proceedings required adding the balance limitation from 15.03.2020 to 01.03.2022, rendering the filing within time; therefore, the rejection on limitation was unsustainable and the appeal was allowed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
