Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Imported polyester knitted cut pile fabric, though classifiable under CTH 6001, was held to fall under the "others" sub-heading because the test report showed it was neither long pile nor looped pile fabric; being of man-made fibres, it was correctly classified under CTI 6001 92 00, and the consequential duty demand was sustained. Misdeclaration of quantity and nature of goods, including non-declaration of some goods, rendered them liable to confiscation under s.111(l) and (m) of the Customs Act, and confiscation was upheld. As the misdeclaration attracted confiscability, penalty under s.112 was also upheld, resulting in dismissal of the appeal. - CESTAT
Imported polyester knitted cut pile fabric, though classifiable under CTH 6001, was held to fall under the "others" sub-heading because the test report showed it was neither long pile nor looped pile fabric; being of man-made fibres, it was correctly classified under CTI 6001 92 00, and the consequential duty demand was sustained. Misdeclaration of quantity and nature of goods, including non-declaration of some goods, rendered them liable to confiscation under s.111(l) and (m) of the Customs Act, and confiscation was upheld. As the misdeclaration attracted confiscability, penalty under s.112 was also upheld, resulting in dismissal of the appeal. - CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
