Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Bank's continued freezing of a company's accounts was held unjustified once the ROC, acting on MCA directions, had unmarked the "management dispute" flag; such ROC marking pertains to statutory compliances under company law and does not fetter ordinary banking operations, hence the bank had no basis to persist with the freeze and was bound to comply with the earlier defreezing direction. Former directors, whose oppression and mismanagement challenge had been dismissed and against which no appellate stay operated, were held to lack locus standi to object to account operations or seek recall/impleadment. The order suspending the defreezing direction and keeping contempt in abeyance, passed without reasons or a prima facie finding, was set aside and the appeal disposed. - HC
Bank's continued freezing of a company's accounts was held unjustified once the ROC, acting on MCA directions, had unmarked the "management dispute" flag; such ROC marking pertains to statutory compliances under company law and does not fetter ordinary banking operations, hence the bank had no basis to persist with the freeze and was bound to comply with the earlier defreezing direction. Former directors, whose oppression and mismanagement challenge had been dismissed and against which no appellate stay operated, were held to lack locus standi to object to account operations or seek recall/impleadment. The order suspending the defreezing direction and keeping contempt in abeyance, passed without reasons or a prima facie finding, was set aside and the appeal disposed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.