Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
A transfer application seeking shifting of proceedings from one NCLT Bench was rejected, where the applicants alleged that a Technical Member "threatened to vacate" an interim stay during hearing. The Court held that transfer cannot be granted merely due to oral observations made in the course of proceedings, and characterised the plea as an unjustified attempt to browbeat the Tribunal; hence, the President's decision to treat the application as liable to dismissal required no interference. The legal question raised in a connected matter filed by the same applicants was expressly kept open to be decided in separate proceedings where notice had been issued. - SC
A transfer application seeking shifting of proceedings from one NCLT Bench was rejected, where the applicants alleged that a Technical Member "threatened to vacate" an interim stay during hearing. The Court held that transfer cannot be granted merely due to oral observations made in the course of proceedings, and characterised the plea as an unjustified attempt to browbeat the Tribunal; hence, the President's decision to treat the application as liable to dismissal required no interference. The legal question raised in a connected matter filed by the same applicants was expressly kept open to be decided in separate proceedings where notice had been issued. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
