Co-operative society's mandatory reserve and share capital fixed deposits with banks-interest treated as business income under 80P(2)(a)(iii) deductio...
Income tax reassessment reopening after four years on investigation tip, without s.147 proviso disclosure failure, struck down as borrowed satisfactio...
The dominant issue was whether the appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was rightly dismissed as time-barred despite the appellant's explanation for delay. The Court held that the appellate tribunal inadequately and improperly evaluated the "sufficient cause" shown for condonation, warranting interference. Consequently, the order dismissing the appeal on limitation was set aside, and the matter was remitted for adjudication of the appeal on merits in accordance with law, with connected appeals to be heard together. - SC
The dominant issue was whether the appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was rightly dismissed as time-barred despite the appellant's explanation for delay. The Court held that the appellate tribunal inadequately and improperly evaluated the "sufficient cause" shown for condonation, warranting interference. Consequently, the order dismissing the appeal on limitation was set aside, and the matter was remitted for adjudication of the appeal on merits in accordance with law, with connected appeals to be heard together. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
