Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
The dominant issue was whether the appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was rightly dismissed as time-barred despite the appellant's explanation for delay. The Court held that the appellate tribunal inadequately and improperly evaluated the "sufficient cause" shown for condonation, warranting interference. Consequently, the order dismissing the appeal on limitation was set aside, and the matter was remitted for adjudication of the appeal on merits in accordance with law, with connected appeals to be heard together. - SC
The dominant issue was whether the appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was rightly dismissed as time-barred despite the appellant's explanation for delay. The Court held that the appellate tribunal inadequately and improperly evaluated the "sufficient cause" shown for condonation, warranting interference. Consequently, the order dismissing the appeal on limitation was set aside, and the matter was remitted for adjudication of the appeal on merits in accordance with law, with connected appeals to be heard together. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
