Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The dominant issue was whether the appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was rightly dismissed as time-barred despite the appellant's explanation for delay. The Court held that the appellate tribunal inadequately and improperly evaluated the "sufficient cause" shown for condonation, warranting interference. Consequently, the order dismissing the appeal on limitation was set aside, and the matter was remitted for adjudication of the appeal on merits in accordance with law, with connected appeals to be heard together. - SC
The dominant issue was whether the appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was rightly dismissed as time-barred despite the appellant's explanation for delay. The Court held that the appellate tribunal inadequately and improperly evaluated the "sufficient cause" shown for condonation, warranting interference. Consequently, the order dismissing the appeal on limitation was set aside, and the matter was remitted for adjudication of the appeal on merits in accordance with law, with connected appeals to be heard together. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
