Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Contempt jurisdiction being penal and statutory cannot be assumed by implication or on equitable considerations. Since Section 425 of the Companies Act, 2013 confers on the NCLT/NCLAT the same contempt powers as a HC in respect of contempt of their own orders, such power is plenary and applies to all proceedings before the Tribunal, including those under the IBC; hence parties cannot bypass the statutorily empowered forum by approaching the HC under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Any intervention by the HC, if warranted, lies only under Articles 226/227 and not through a contempt petition. The contempt petition was held not maintainable and dismissed - HC
Contempt jurisdiction being penal and statutory cannot be assumed by implication or on equitable considerations. Since Section 425 of the Companies Act, 2013 confers on the NCLT/NCLAT the same contempt powers as a HC in respect of contempt of their own orders, such power is plenary and applies to all proceedings before the Tribunal, including those under the IBC; hence parties cannot bypass the statutorily empowered forum by approaching the HC under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Any intervention by the HC, if warranted, lies only under Articles 226/227 and not through a contempt petition. The contempt petition was held not maintainable and dismissed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
