Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Recusal by tribunal members must strictly conform to Rule 62 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 and cannot be founded on counsel's communications, allegations, or perceived pressure; since the recusals were unreasoned and appeared triggered by an email and courtroom conduct rather than any statutory ground, the recusal orders were held illegal and were quashed. Administrative transfer of pending matters cannot be used to alter a bench's territorial jurisdiction; Rule 16(d) empowers the President only to transfer cases within the same territorial limits, and where transfer objections were already pending on the judicial side, administrative transfer was improper. The administrative transfer orders shifting matters from Ahmedabad to Mumbai were set aside. - HC
Recusal by tribunal members must strictly conform to Rule 62 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 and cannot be founded on counsel's communications, allegations, or perceived pressure; since the recusals were unreasoned and appeared triggered by an email and courtroom conduct rather than any statutory ground, the recusal orders were held illegal and were quashed. Administrative transfer of pending matters cannot be used to alter a bench's territorial jurisdiction; Rule 16(d) empowers the President only to transfer cases within the same territorial limits, and where transfer objections were already pending on the judicial side, administrative transfer was improper. The administrative transfer orders shifting matters from Ahmedabad to Mumbai were set aside. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
