Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Healthcare services rendered for diagnosis, treatment, or care of dermatological diseases such as psoriasis, dandruff, dermatitis, fungal infections, folliculitis, and similar ailments were treated as "health care services" and held exempt under Sl. No. 74 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), since they are therapeutic services aimed at treating medical conditions; exemption was allowed for such services. Services in the nature of hair transplant/hair fixing or other cosmetic/plastic procedures were held not to qualify for the exemption where undertaken for aesthetic enhancement, and would be exempt only if performed to restore or reconstruct anatomy or bodily functions affected by congenital defect, developmental abnormality, injury, or trauma; exemption was denied for purely cosmetic services. - AAR
Healthcare services rendered for diagnosis, treatment, or care of dermatological diseases such as psoriasis, dandruff, dermatitis, fungal infections, folliculitis, and similar ailments were treated as "health care services" and held exempt under Sl. No. 74 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), since they are therapeutic services aimed at treating medical conditions; exemption was allowed for such services. Services in the nature of hair transplant/hair fixing or other cosmetic/plastic procedures were held not to qualify for the exemption where undertaken for aesthetic enhancement, and would be exempt only if performed to restore or reconstruct anatomy or bodily functions affected by congenital defect, developmental abnormality, injury, or trauma; exemption was denied for purely cosmetic services. - AAR
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
