Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Deduction under s.10AA was denied on processing on the ground that the audit report in Form 56F was not filed along with the return within the prescribed time. It was held that Form 56F was filed within the extended due date notified by CBDT, and therefore could not be treated as belated for denying the s.10AA claim; the first appellate authority correctly allowed the deduction. It was further held that, for the relevant AY, s.10AA benefit is not contingent on filing the return within the due date under s.139(1), and a return filed under s.139(4) does not bar the claim. The disallowance was set aside and relief to the assessee sustained. - ITAT
Deduction under s.10AA was denied on processing on the ground that the audit report in Form 56F was not filed along with the return within the prescribed time. It was held that Form 56F was filed within the extended due date notified by CBDT, and therefore could not be treated as belated for denying the s.10AA claim; the first appellate authority correctly allowed the deduction. It was further held that, for the relevant AY, s.10AA benefit is not contingent on filing the return within the due date under s.139(1), and a return filed under s.139(4) does not bar the claim. The disallowance was set aside and relief to the assessee sustained. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
