Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
An interim direction for forensic audit during pendency of a petition under ss. 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013 was challenged on the ground that no specific relief for audit was sought and no prima facie finding of oppression or mismanagement was recorded. The tribunal held that s. 242(4) confers discretionary interim powers, and the petition contained allegations of mismanagement and siphoning of funds, with intense inter se hostility and counter-allegations. Since the company was non-operational and the audit would assist the adjudicating forum in ascertaining the truth for fair adjudication of the main petition, the discretion was not interfered with; the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
An interim direction for forensic audit during pendency of a petition under ss. 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013 was challenged on the ground that no specific relief for audit was sought and no prima facie finding of oppression or mismanagement was recorded. The tribunal held that s. 242(4) confers discretionary interim powers, and the petition contained allegations of mismanagement and siphoning of funds, with intense inter se hostility and counter-allegations. Since the company was non-operational and the audit would assist the adjudicating forum in ascertaining the truth for fair adjudication of the main petition, the discretion was not interfered with; the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
