Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6361 to 6380 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Avoidance of a pre-CIRP sale as a fraudulent transaction was sought on the ground that it was without consideration and intended to defraud creditors. In the absence of any pending creditor claims at the time of execution, the subsequent classification of the debtor's bank account as NPA, and the presence of other secured assets, the requisite intent to defraud was not established; the liquidator failed to discharge the heavy burden of proof. Alleged সনà§à¦¦ about an old acknowledgment letter and the purchaser's non-production of decades-old payment records did not negate consideration, especially where contemporaneous corporate disclosures and financial statements corroborated the transfer, and consideration could be furnished by a third party. The appeal was dismissed. - SC
Avoidance of a pre-CIRP sale as a fraudulent transaction was sought on the ground that it was without consideration and intended to defraud creditors. In the absence of any pending creditor claims at the time of execution, the subsequent classification of the debtor's bank account as NPA, and the presence of other secured assets, the requisite intent to defraud was not established; the liquidator failed to discharge the heavy burden of proof. Alleged সনà§à¦¦ about an old acknowledgment letter and the purchaser's non-production of decades-old payment records did not negate consideration, especially where contemporaneous corporate disclosures and financial statements corroborated the transfer, and consideration could be furnished by a third party. The appeal was dismissed. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
