Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
An operational creditor sought to assail approval of a CIRP resolution plan through collateral proceedings, contending prejudice in payments vis-Ã -vis liquidation value. The record showed the creditor had prior knowledge of the plan and CoC deliberations, including receipt of minutes before adjudicating authority approval, and had even acted on that knowledge by seeking to submit its own plan. Having failed to institute a proper statutory challenge to the plan approval within the prescribed framework, the creditor could not maintain an indirect, parallel challenge to reopen the plan. The appeals were dismissed and the plan approval was left undisturbed. - SC
An operational creditor sought to assail approval of a CIRP resolution plan through collateral proceedings, contending prejudice in payments vis-Ã -vis liquidation value. The record showed the creditor had prior knowledge of the plan and CoC deliberations, including receipt of minutes before adjudicating authority approval, and had even acted on that knowledge by seeking to submit its own plan. Having failed to institute a proper statutory challenge to the plan approval within the prescribed framework, the creditor could not maintain an indirect, parallel challenge to reopen the plan. The appeals were dismissed and the plan approval was left undisturbed. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
