Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
An operational creditor sought to assail approval of a CIRP resolution plan through collateral proceedings, contending prejudice in payments vis-Ã -vis liquidation value. The record showed the creditor had prior knowledge of the plan and CoC deliberations, including receipt of minutes before adjudicating authority approval, and had even acted on that knowledge by seeking to submit its own plan. Having failed to institute a proper statutory challenge to the plan approval within the prescribed framework, the creditor could not maintain an indirect, parallel challenge to reopen the plan. The appeals were dismissed and the plan approval was left undisturbed. - SC
An operational creditor sought to assail approval of a CIRP resolution plan through collateral proceedings, contending prejudice in payments vis-Ã -vis liquidation value. The record showed the creditor had prior knowledge of the plan and CoC deliberations, including receipt of minutes before adjudicating authority approval, and had even acted on that knowledge by seeking to submit its own plan. Having failed to institute a proper statutory challenge to the plan approval within the prescribed framework, the creditor could not maintain an indirect, parallel challenge to reopen the plan. The appeals were dismissed and the plan approval was left undisturbed. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
