Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Whether an operational creditor's Section 9 application satisfied the statutory monetary threshold required determination of the actual operational debt, including disputes on charging of double licence fee and amenities and the effect of termination of the leave and licence and amenities agreements after expiry of the lock-in period. The adjudicating authority erred by not examining these issues in sufficient depth and by failing to compute the amount due to ascertain if the threshold was crossed, rendering the order non-speaking on a material jurisdictional precondition. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by a speaking order. - NCLAT
Whether an operational creditor's Section 9 application satisfied the statutory monetary threshold required determination of the actual operational debt, including disputes on charging of double licence fee and amenities and the effect of termination of the leave and licence and amenities agreements after expiry of the lock-in period. The adjudicating authority erred by not examining these issues in sufficient depth and by failing to compute the amount due to ascertain if the threshold was crossed, rendering the order non-speaking on a material jurisdictional precondition. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by a speaking order. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
