Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Whether an operational creditor's Section 9 application satisfied the statutory monetary threshold required determination of the actual operational debt, including disputes on charging of double licence fee and amenities and the effect of termination of the leave and licence and amenities agreements after expiry of the lock-in period. The adjudicating authority erred by not examining these issues in sufficient depth and by failing to compute the amount due to ascertain if the threshold was crossed, rendering the order non-speaking on a material jurisdictional precondition. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by a speaking order. - NCLAT
Whether an operational creditor's Section 9 application satisfied the statutory monetary threshold required determination of the actual operational debt, including disputes on charging of double licence fee and amenities and the effect of termination of the leave and licence and amenities agreements after expiry of the lock-in period. The adjudicating authority erred by not examining these issues in sufficient depth and by failing to compute the amount due to ascertain if the threshold was crossed, rendering the order non-speaking on a material jurisdictional precondition. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by a speaking order. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
