Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where an authority directed a stakeholder to remit CIRP costs within a stipulated time and file a compliance memo, and that foundational order was neither challenged nor stayed, its directions attained finality and were mandatorily enforceable. An ensuing order merely compelling compliance and warning of initiation of contempt proceedings for continued default was held to be a natural consequence of disobedience and not amenable to interference, particularly as no contempt finding or punishment had yet been imposed. As the liability to pay CIRP costs had already been conclusively determined in the unchallenged prior order, the appeal against the compliance-enforcement order was dismissed. - NCLAT
Where an authority directed a stakeholder to remit CIRP costs within a stipulated time and file a compliance memo, and that foundational order was neither challenged nor stayed, its directions attained finality and were mandatorily enforceable. An ensuing order merely compelling compliance and warning of initiation of contempt proceedings for continued default was held to be a natural consequence of disobedience and not amenable to interference, particularly as no contempt finding or punishment had yet been imposed. As the liability to pay CIRP costs had already been conclusively determined in the unchallenged prior order, the appeal against the compliance-enforcement order was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.