Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
781 to 800 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where an authority directed a stakeholder to remit CIRP costs within a stipulated time and file a compliance memo, and that foundational order was neither challenged nor stayed, its directions attained finality and were mandatorily enforceable. An ensuing order merely compelling compliance and warning of initiation of contempt proceedings for continued default was held to be a natural consequence of disobedience and not amenable to interference, particularly as no contempt finding or punishment had yet been imposed. As the liability to pay CIRP costs had already been conclusively determined in the unchallenged prior order, the appeal against the compliance-enforcement order was dismissed. - NCLAT
Where an authority directed a stakeholder to remit CIRP costs within a stipulated time and file a compliance memo, and that foundational order was neither challenged nor stayed, its directions attained finality and were mandatorily enforceable. An ensuing order merely compelling compliance and warning of initiation of contempt proceedings for continued default was held to be a natural consequence of disobedience and not amenable to interference, particularly as no contempt finding or punishment had yet been imposed. As the liability to pay CIRP costs had already been conclusively determined in the unchallenged prior order, the appeal against the compliance-enforcement order was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.