Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where an authority directed a stakeholder to remit CIRP costs within a stipulated time and file a compliance memo, and that foundational order was neither challenged nor stayed, its directions attained finality and were mandatorily enforceable. An ensuing order merely compelling compliance and warning of initiation of contempt proceedings for continued default was held to be a natural consequence of disobedience and not amenable to interference, particularly as no contempt finding or punishment had yet been imposed. As the liability to pay CIRP costs had already been conclusively determined in the unchallenged prior order, the appeal against the compliance-enforcement order was dismissed. - NCLAT
Where an authority directed a stakeholder to remit CIRP costs within a stipulated time and file a compliance memo, and that foundational order was neither challenged nor stayed, its directions attained finality and were mandatorily enforceable. An ensuing order merely compelling compliance and warning of initiation of contempt proceedings for continued default was held to be a natural consequence of disobedience and not amenable to interference, particularly as no contempt finding or punishment had yet been imposed. As the liability to pay CIRP costs had already been conclusively determined in the unchallenged prior order, the appeal against the compliance-enforcement order was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.