Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Auction sale of an attached yacht belonging to the corporate debtor was challenged as violating the moratorium under s.14 IBC and was set aside by the adjudicating authority. Since the magistrate had permitted sale of the attached movable property and the auction was conducted before commencement of CIRP, s.14 IBC was inapplicable and the finding of moratorium breach was legally untenable; the auction was therefore not void. The adjudicating authority also lacked jurisdiction to interfere with an auction conducted pursuant to a criminal court's attachment/sale order, and no further directions were warranted regarding sale proceeds in this appeal; the impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed. - NCLAT
Auction sale of an attached yacht belonging to the corporate debtor was challenged as violating the moratorium under s.14 IBC and was set aside by the adjudicating authority. Since the magistrate had permitted sale of the attached movable property and the auction was conducted before commencement of CIRP, s.14 IBC was inapplicable and the finding of moratorium breach was legally untenable; the auction was therefore not void. The adjudicating authority also lacked jurisdiction to interfere with an auction conducted pursuant to a criminal court's attachment/sale order, and no further directions were warranted regarding sale proceeds in this appeal; the impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
