Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Reassessment initiated under s.147 based on material emanating from a third-party search was held valid because the statutory preconditions for s.153C were not met, particularly the absence of any satisfaction note by the searched person's AO and its transmission to the assessee's AO; hence the assessee could not compel invocation of s.153C, and the AO's formation of belief was supported by fresh tangible material regarding alleged pre-arranged trades to claim s.10(38) exemption, so the jurisdictional challenge failed. On the s.68 addition treating share sale proceeds as unexplained, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration since the assessee had not discharged onus, yet certain relied-upon external data was not confronted; directions were issued to permit further evidence and require disclosure of the relied material. - ITAT
Reassessment initiated under s.147 based on material emanating from a third-party search was held valid because the statutory preconditions for s.153C were not met, particularly the absence of any satisfaction note by the searched person's AO and its transmission to the assessee's AO; hence the assessee could not compel invocation of s.153C, and the AO's formation of belief was supported by fresh tangible material regarding alleged pre-arranged trades to claim s.10(38) exemption, so the jurisdictional challenge failed. On the s.68 addition treating share sale proceeds as unexplained, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration since the assessee had not discharged onus, yet certain relied-upon external data was not confronted; directions were issued to permit further evidence and require disclosure of the relied material. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
