NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Depreciation on manufacturing and supply/maintenance contracts acquired under slump sale was allowable as eligible intangible assets, following co-ordinate bench precedent; the depreciation claim was therefore allowed. Brought-forward and unabsorbed depreciation was held consequential to outcomes in earlier years; the AO was directed to allow it in accordance with tribunal orders for the relevant preceding years. For TP on purchase of finished goods and analysers, a specified comparable was directed to be considered, requiring recomputation. For indenting commission, exclusion of two comparables was remanded to the TPO for verification of agreements, with directions to exclude if functionally similar to already-rejected comparables. TP adjustment was directed to be restricted to AE transactions, double disallowance was to be deleted on verification, reimbursement TP at nil was rejected, and TDS/TCS/advance tax credits were to be granted after verification. - ITAT
Depreciation on manufacturing and supply/maintenance contracts acquired under slump sale was allowable as eligible intangible assets, following co-ordinate bench precedent; the depreciation claim was therefore allowed. Brought-forward and unabsorbed depreciation was held consequential to outcomes in earlier years; the AO was directed to allow it in accordance with tribunal orders for the relevant preceding years. For TP on purchase of finished goods and analysers, a specified comparable was directed to be considered, requiring recomputation. For indenting commission, exclusion of two comparables was remanded to the TPO for verification of agreements, with directions to exclude if functionally similar to already-rejected comparables. TP adjustment was directed to be restricted to AE transactions, double disallowance was to be deleted on verification, reimbursement TP at nil was rejected, and TDS/TCS/advance tax credits were to be granted after verification. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.