Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6361 to 6380 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening under s.147/s.148 for a post-search unabated year was upheld, as issuance of notice does not require incriminating material found with the assessee and the existence of material warranting additions is to be examined during reassessment proceedings; objections that additions were based on third-party search material were rejected. Additions founded on information gathered behind the assessee's back without confronting the material or allowing cross-examination were held to violate s.142(2)/(3) and were unsustainable. Estimated addition for alleged bogus purchases based solely on a GST report, without independent enquiry despite documentary purchase evidence, was deleted. Additions u/s 69D/69C for alleged cash loans based on unreliable third-party loose papers and conjecture were quashed. - ITAT
Reopening under s.147/s.148 for a post-search unabated year was upheld, as issuance of notice does not require incriminating material found with the assessee and the existence of material warranting additions is to be examined during reassessment proceedings; objections that additions were based on third-party search material were rejected. Additions founded on information gathered behind the assessee's back without confronting the material or allowing cross-examination were held to violate s.142(2)/(3) and were unsustainable. Estimated addition for alleged bogus purchases based solely on a GST report, without independent enquiry despite documentary purchase evidence, was deleted. Additions u/s 69D/69C for alleged cash loans based on unreliable third-party loose papers and conjecture were quashed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
