Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
On addition under s.68 r.w.s. 115BBE for an unsecured loan, the tribunal held that the loan stood established as genuine on parity with an earlier decision involving identical facts and allegations, and therefore deleted the addition. On addition under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash-in-hand treated as unexplained, it held that the cash was duly recorded in the books of multiple group entities and the source was thus explained; the deletion by the first appellate authority was upheld and the Revenue's ground was dismissed. On disallowance under s.37(1), it held that the AO made a double addition despite the assessee's own disallowance in computation; the deletion was sustained. - ITAT
On addition under s.68 r.w.s. 115BBE for an unsecured loan, the tribunal held that the loan stood established as genuine on parity with an earlier decision involving identical facts and allegations, and therefore deleted the addition. On addition under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash-in-hand treated as unexplained, it held that the cash was duly recorded in the books of multiple group entities and the source was thus explained; the deletion by the first appellate authority was upheld and the Revenue's ground was dismissed. On disallowance under s.37(1), it held that the AO made a double addition despite the assessee's own disallowance in computation; the deletion was sustained. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
