Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6361 to 6380 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
On addition under s.68 r.w.s. 115BBE for an unsecured loan, the tribunal held that the loan stood established as genuine on parity with an earlier decision involving identical facts and allegations, and therefore deleted the addition. On addition under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash-in-hand treated as unexplained, it held that the cash was duly recorded in the books of multiple group entities and the source was thus explained; the deletion by the first appellate authority was upheld and the Revenue's ground was dismissed. On disallowance under s.37(1), it held that the AO made a double addition despite the assessee's own disallowance in computation; the deletion was sustained. - ITAT
On addition under s.68 r.w.s. 115BBE for an unsecured loan, the tribunal held that the loan stood established as genuine on parity with an earlier decision involving identical facts and allegations, and therefore deleted the addition. On addition under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash-in-hand treated as unexplained, it held that the cash was duly recorded in the books of multiple group entities and the source was thus explained; the deletion by the first appellate authority was upheld and the Revenue's ground was dismissed. On disallowance under s.37(1), it held that the AO made a double addition despite the assessee's own disallowance in computation; the deletion was sustained. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
