Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
On addition under s.68 r.w.s. 115BBE for an unsecured loan, the tribunal held that the loan stood established as genuine on parity with an earlier decision involving identical facts and allegations, and therefore deleted the addition. On addition under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash-in-hand treated as unexplained, it held that the cash was duly recorded in the books of multiple group entities and the source was thus explained; the deletion by the first appellate authority was upheld and the Revenue's ground was dismissed. On disallowance under s.37(1), it held that the AO made a double addition despite the assessee's own disallowance in computation; the deletion was sustained. - ITAT
On addition under s.68 r.w.s. 115BBE for an unsecured loan, the tribunal held that the loan stood established as genuine on parity with an earlier decision involving identical facts and allegations, and therefore deleted the addition. On addition under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash-in-hand treated as unexplained, it held that the cash was duly recorded in the books of multiple group entities and the source was thus explained; the deletion by the first appellate authority was upheld and the Revenue's ground was dismissed. On disallowance under s.37(1), it held that the AO made a double addition despite the assessee's own disallowance in computation; the deletion was sustained. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
