Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Inter-unit transfer pricing for chilled milk was held to be at "market value" where processing units would otherwise have procured from third parties, so treating arm's length price as nil and denying deduction under s.80IB(11A) was unjustified; deduction was allowed, subject to verification that audit reports in Form 10CCB for all eligible units were filed, failing which adverse inferences would not survive. Allocation of profits based on third-party overhead benchmarks was held to yield profits "derived from" eligible chilling units; departmental objection was rejected. Disallowance under s.14A was sustained in principle but capped to exempt income. Differential interest disallowance under s.37 on a concessional advance was deleted due to sufficiency of interest-free funds. s.80JJAA quantification was remanded for verification. - ITAT
Inter-unit transfer pricing for chilled milk was held to be at "market value" where processing units would otherwise have procured from third parties, so treating arm's length price as nil and denying deduction under s.80IB(11A) was unjustified; deduction was allowed, subject to verification that audit reports in Form 10CCB for all eligible units were filed, failing which adverse inferences would not survive. Allocation of profits based on third-party overhead benchmarks was held to yield profits "derived from" eligible chilling units; departmental objection was rejected. Disallowance under s.14A was sustained in principle but capped to exempt income. Differential interest disallowance under s.37 on a concessional advance was deleted due to sufficiency of interest-free funds. s.80JJAA quantification was remanded for verification. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.