Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In assessment under s.153A, the core issue was whether additions for alleged unreported commission could be sustained on the basis of seized documents. The tribunal held that the seized material did not belong to the assessee; therefore, any assessment or addition founded on such documents lacked evidentiary basis and was unsustainable, resulting in deletion of the commission additions. On the related issue of the first appellate authority's direction to adopt a commission/net profit rate by referencing a rate used by the Settlement Commission in another group's case, the tribunal held that this direction was inseparably premised on the same incriminating material and thus could not survive; the assessee's ground was allowed. - ITAT
In assessment under s.153A, the core issue was whether additions for alleged unreported commission could be sustained on the basis of seized documents. The tribunal held that the seized material did not belong to the assessee; therefore, any assessment or addition founded on such documents lacked evidentiary basis and was unsustainable, resulting in deletion of the commission additions. On the related issue of the first appellate authority's direction to adopt a commission/net profit rate by referencing a rate used by the Settlement Commission in another group's case, the tribunal held that this direction was inseparably premised on the same incriminating material and thus could not survive; the assessee's ground was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.