Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
In assessment under s.153A, the core issue was whether additions for alleged unreported commission could be sustained on the basis of seized documents. The tribunal held that the seized material did not belong to the assessee; therefore, any assessment or addition founded on such documents lacked evidentiary basis and was unsustainable, resulting in deletion of the commission additions. On the related issue of the first appellate authority's direction to adopt a commission/net profit rate by referencing a rate used by the Settlement Commission in another group's case, the tribunal held that this direction was inseparably premised on the same incriminating material and thus could not survive; the assessee's ground was allowed. - ITAT
In assessment under s.153A, the core issue was whether additions for alleged unreported commission could be sustained on the basis of seized documents. The tribunal held that the seized material did not belong to the assessee; therefore, any assessment or addition founded on such documents lacked evidentiary basis and was unsustainable, resulting in deletion of the commission additions. On the related issue of the first appellate authority's direction to adopt a commission/net profit rate by referencing a rate used by the Settlement Commission in another group's case, the tribunal held that this direction was inseparably premised on the same incriminating material and thus could not survive; the assessee's ground was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.