Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The dominant issue was whether the appellate tribunal could, in an assessee's appeal, set aside the adjudicating authority's unchallenged direction permitting redemption fine and re-export, and thereby sustain absolute confiscation. Since the Department neither filed an appeal nor cross-objections and did not invoke statutory review remedies, the redemption and re-export direction had attained finality and did not arise from the assessee's grounds. Despite the tribunal's wide powers under the statute, it could not travel beyond the scope of the appeal to grant relief adverse to the assessee on an aspect not under challenge, amounting to excess of jurisdiction. The tribunal's interference was therefore set aside and the appeal was allowed. - HC
The dominant issue was whether the appellate tribunal could, in an assessee's appeal, set aside the adjudicating authority's unchallenged direction permitting redemption fine and re-export, and thereby sustain absolute confiscation. Since the Department neither filed an appeal nor cross-objections and did not invoke statutory review remedies, the redemption and re-export direction had attained finality and did not arise from the assessee's grounds. Despite the tribunal's wide powers under the statute, it could not travel beyond the scope of the appeal to grant relief adverse to the assessee on an aspect not under challenge, amounting to excess of jurisdiction. The tribunal's interference was therefore set aside and the appeal was allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.