Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
The dominant issue was maintainability of the appeal under the statutory time limit in section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The provision mandates filing within 45 days from the date the order is made available, with a further condonable period capped at 45 days on sufficient cause, creating an outer limit of 90 days. Applying the SC's extension directions, the last permissible date was computed as 30.05.2022; filing on 31.05.2022 exceeded the non-extendable outer limit. Consequently, the appeal was held time-barred and dismissed. - NCLAT
The dominant issue was maintainability of the appeal under the statutory time limit in section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The provision mandates filing within 45 days from the date the order is made available, with a further condonable period capped at 45 days on sufficient cause, creating an outer limit of 90 days. Applying the SC's extension directions, the last permissible date was computed as 30.05.2022; filing on 31.05.2022 exceeded the non-extendable outer limit. Consequently, the appeal was held time-barred and dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.