Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6141 to 6160 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The dominant issue was maintainability of the appeal under the statutory time limit in section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The provision mandates filing within 45 days from the date the order is made available, with a further condonable period capped at 45 days on sufficient cause, creating an outer limit of 90 days. Applying the SC's extension directions, the last permissible date was computed as 30.05.2022; filing on 31.05.2022 exceeded the non-extendable outer limit. Consequently, the appeal was held time-barred and dismissed. - NCLAT
The dominant issue was maintainability of the appeal under the statutory time limit in section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The provision mandates filing within 45 days from the date the order is made available, with a further condonable period capped at 45 days on sufficient cause, creating an outer limit of 90 days. Applying the SC's extension directions, the last permissible date was computed as 30.05.2022; filing on 31.05.2022 exceeded the non-extendable outer limit. Consequently, the appeal was held time-barred and dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
