Interest on Wrongful Input Tax Credit is mandatory where excess transitional credit was retained and later reversed, and related objections were rejec...
Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6181 to 6200 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance of consultancy fees was examined on whether the...
Consultancy fees claimed as business expense-can tax disallowance rest on survey suspicion despite invoices, contracts and bank trail? Appeal dismissed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Disallowance of consultancy fees was examined on whether the expenditure could be rejected solely on perceived documentation inconsistencies and uncorroborated third-party survey inputs. The addition was held unsustainable because the revenue produced no cogent material showing invoices were bogus, services were not rendered or commensurate, or payments were excessive or routed back in cash, and no incriminating survey material was confronted to the taxpayer. Mere third-party information and suspicion could not substitute proof once primary evidence (agreements, invoices, banking trail, TDS) was furnished and the burden shifted to the revenue. The deletion of the addition was upheld and the revenue's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
Disallowance of consultancy fees was examined on whether the expenditure could be rejected solely on perceived documentation inconsistencies and uncorroborated third-party survey inputs. The addition was held unsustainable because the revenue produced no cogent material showing invoices were bogus, services were not rendered or commensurate, or payments were excessive or routed back in cash, and no incriminating survey material was confronted to the taxpayer. Mere third-party information and suspicion could not substitute proof once primary evidence (agreements, invoices, banking trail, TDS) was furnished and the burden shifted to the revenue. The deletion of the addition was upheld and the revenue's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.